Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Kingdom that Turned the World Upside Down  /  Chapter 33, The Kingdom Banner Arises Anew  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 10
Across the Quakers, Pietists, Dunkards, and Fröhlich’s movement, the chapter repeatedly links “new Kingdom movements” with simple theology, literal obedience (non-resistance, no oaths, simplicity), enthusiastic witness, and later decline through respectability or activism; if you tried to apply that pattern to your own congregation or life, what specific changes would be most costly—and what would you be tempted to label “works Christianity” in order to avoid them?
Another way to ask: The chapter says new “Kingdom movements” often start with simple beliefs and literal obedience, but later drift into respectability or activism—how might that pattern show up in your church or life? What changes would cost you the most, and what would you be tempted to call “works Christianity” to avoid them?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests the costly changes would be moving toward literal obedience to Jesus’ teachings (especially non-resistance, rejecting oaths, simplicity, and refusing wealth-driven living) and returning to enthusiastic witness by ordinary believers. It also warns we may be tempted to dismiss these as “works Christianity,” even though Bercot frames them as the lived Gospel of the Kingdom.

Support from Transcript:

  • Alexander Mack’s group rejected “oaths, war, the accumulation of wealth, lawsuits,” because these conflicted with Christ’s teaching.
  • Fröhlich’s fellowships returned to “non-resistance… the role that obedience plays in salvation… rejection of oaths and materialism,” and they “witnessed enthusiastically.”
  • Bercot says new Kingdom movements often have “simple theology” and focus on “the Kingdom and its King,” not “intricate issues of theology.”
  • He notes later decline: Quakers’ “inner light” emphasis led to “greater and greater social activism and less reliance on the Scriptures,” becoming “extremely liberal.”
  • He observes growing movements often gained “seminaries… respectability,” and “usually lost most of their Kingdom teachings,” and that Reformation churches often label Kingdom Christianity as “works Christianity.”
Discussion Follow-ups Which of Jesus’ lifestyle teachings would cost you most socially or financially? Where might “respectability” (or political activism) be quietly replacing the Kingdom message and obedience in your life?

Jumpstarter 10 of 10
Back Questions Done