Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 4
Bercot says many Kingdom Christians remained within the Catholic Church because it still taught “the need to live obediently to Christ,” yet it relegated Jesus’ teachings to “the sphere of perfectionism”; what happens to a church’s picture of God when obedience to Jesus is treated as optional “perfection” rather than normal discipleship?
Another way to ask: What happens to how a church sees God when obeying Jesus is treated as optional “extra credit” instead of normal discipleship? How does that change what people expect from Christianity?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, treating Jesus’ teachings as “perfectionism” makes God’s Kingdom commands sound like an optional upgrade instead of the normal life of Christ’s people. It can leave the impression that ordinary Christians don’t really have to “literally live by Christ’s teaching,” even though the church may still praise those who do.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says many Kingdom Christians stayed within the Catholic Church because it still taught “the need to live obediently to Christ.”
  • Yet “rather than completely upholding Jesus’ Kingdom teachings,” it “relegated them to the sphere of perfectionism.”
  • The Church taught that “only those who wanted to be perfect had to literally live by Christ’s teaching.”
  • It “encouraged such Christian perfectionism” (so obedience is admired), but framed as something beyond normal expectation.
  • Despite this framing, “tens of thousands of medieval Christians… lived out Jesus’ teachings quite literally,” showing what Bercot sees as authentic Kingdom life.
Discussion Follow-ups How does the “optional perfection” idea shape what we think God expects from everyday believers? What parts of Jesus’ teaching are most often treated as “for the serious few”?