Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 2

The chapter argues that “popular theology today…begins with Paul” in a way that can make Jesus’ teachings “heretical”; when you hear the concrete statements Bercot says would get him labeled a heretic (forgiving others to be forgiven, feeding/clothing the poor to see heaven, needing to live by Jesus’ teachings to be saved), what doctrinal reflexes rise up in you, and where do you think those reflexes came from?

Another way to ask: When you hear claims like “forgive to be forgiven” and “obey Jesus to be saved,” what teachings in your head push back right away? Where do you think those reactions came from?

Direct Answer Bercot expects many evangelicals to reflexively label those statements “works salvation” or “legalism,” because he says modern systems interpret Paul in a way that forces Christians not to take Jesus at his word. He traces those reflexes to the “Gospel of Easy Believism” and a Paul-first reading that treats Jesus’ commands as optional.

Support from Transcript:

He says he’d be called a heretic in “most Bible-believing churches” if he preached: “The sins you commit each day will not be forgiven unless you forgive other people,” and “If we do not feed the hungry and clothe the poor, we will not see heaven.”
He adds: “To be saved, a person must live by the teachings of Jesus.”
He says popular theology “begins with Paul” and interprets him so as to “make Jesus’ teachings heretical.”
He contrasts this with the Kingdom Gospel: “I can believe Jesus. I can take him at his word.”
He critiques “Easy Believism” later by saying many treat Jesus’ commandments as “merely suggestions.”

Discussion Follow-ups Bercot doesn’t list the exact doctrinal slogans people use, but his examples point to a fear of “earning salvation.” How do your own instincts react when Jesus’ commands are tied to judgment?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 2 of 10