Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Discussion Questions

PDF
Tip: Discuss these with your study group.
David Bercot claims the “Gospel of the Kingdom” is “basically the historic Christian faith” because it takes “the totality of what Jesus and his apostles say” rather than proof-texting—what specific habits of reading Scripture (and which ones in your own church background) does that statement challenge? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Bercot says we should read Scripture by taking in everything Jesus and the apostles taught, not by picking a few “proof texts.” What Bible-reading habits does that challenge, especially ones you learned in your church background?
The chapter argues that “popular theology today…begins with Paul” in a way that can make Jesus’ teachings “heretical”; when you hear the concrete statements Bercot says would get him labeled a heretic (forgiving others to be forgiven, feeding/clothing the poor to see heaven, needing to live by Jesus’ teachings to be saved), what doctrinal reflexes rise up in you, and where do you think those reflexes came from? JumpstartAnother way to ask: When you hear claims like “forgive to be forgiven” and “obey Jesus to be saved,” what teachings in your head push back right away? Where do you think those reactions came from?
Bercot says the Kingdom gospel centers on the Kingdom of God “not on man’s personal salvation,” and that “we cannot separate salvation from the Kingdom”; how would a Kingdom-centered gospel reshape the way you talk about conversion, assurance, church membership, and evangelism? JumpstartAnother way to ask: If the gospel is mainly about God’s Kingdom, not just personal salvation, how would that change how you talk about conversion, assurance, church membership, and sharing your faith?
Using Isaiah 2, he insists the “beat their swords into plowshares” prophecy is being fulfilled now in those who enter Christ’s Kingdom and “forgot war forever”; what do you think early Christians would have assumed this required of them in a pagan empire, and what would it require of believers today who see war, weapons, or national defense as morally necessary? JumpstartAnother way to ask: If Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” is happening now in Christ’s Kingdom, what would early Christians think that meant for them living under a pagan empire? What would it mean today for believers who think war or national defense is sometimes necessary?
The chapter rejects the idea that God “arbitrarily select[s] a certain portion of mankind” for the Kingdom, arguing God wants those who “really love him” and “believe that he will do what he has promised”; what does this reveal about God’s character and purposes in Bercot’s telling, and where does it collide with your existing understanding of election, justice, and mercy? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Bercot rejects the idea that God picks people for the Kingdom in a random way and says God wants those who truly love and trust him. What does that say about God’s character, and where does it clash with what you believe about election, justice, and mercy?
Bercot says God “tests us” and identifies three principal tests—faith, commitment, obedience—rooted in Jesus’ phrases “continued with me in my trials” and “to him who overcomes”; what parts of your Christian life have you interpreted as inconvenience or bad luck that might actually be “testing,” and how would that reinterpretation change the way you respond? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Bercot says God tests us in faith, commitment, and obedience. What hard parts of your life have you seen as bad luck that might be a test, and how would that change how you respond?
On the “test of commitment,” Jesus requires loyalty surpassing even “parents, children, spouse, country, and even our own lives,” illustrated by selling all for the treasure/pearl; what are the most plausible ways sincere Christians today try to reinterpret those sayings so they don’t cost as much, and what might full-strength commitment look like in your actual decisions about time, money, career, and reputation? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Jesus calls for loyalty higher than family, country, and even your own life. How do Christians today explain those sayings away so they cost less, and what would real commitment look like in your choices about time, money, career, and reputation?
Bercot’s “gatecrashers” idea says many who “believe Jesus is their Savior” have “never made any commitment” and do not accept him as Lord, climbing in through “Kingdom invitations without any conditions”; what modern preaching, church culture, or discipleship practices function like “invitations without conditions,” and how can a church call people to Jesus’ conditions without sliding into pride or works-righteousness? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Bercot says many people accept Jesus as Savior but never submit to him as Lord, treating the Kingdom like it has no conditions. What parts of modern preaching or church culture feel like “no-conditions” invitations, and how can a church call people to Jesus’ demands without becoming proud or teaching salvation-by-works?
The chapter’s relational picture (vine/branches) includes the warning that fruitless branches are “taken away,” “cut off,” and “thrown into the fire”; how do you reconcile those words with common evangelical language about eternal security, and what kind of “fruit” does the chapter emphasize that you might be tempted to replace with religious activity or doctrinal correctness? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Jesus warns that branches that don’t bear fruit are cut off and thrown into the fire. How do you fit that with “once saved, always saved,” and what kind of fruit does this chapter stress that you might replace with being busy at church or having right doctrine?
Bercot attacks “phony obedience” based on subjective impulses and says we abide in Christ “not by singing his praises, but by obeying him,” yet also insists this is not earning “brownie points” and that Jesus’ yoke becomes “easy” only when we detach from worldly entanglements; where are you most likely to substitute inward impressions for New Testament commands, and what specific attachment (possessions, freedoms, status, comfort) makes Jesus’ commandments feel “heavy” to you right now? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Bercot says real obedience means following Jesus’ commands, not just following inner feelings, but it’s also not about earning points with God. Where do you tend to trust your feelings over New Testament commands, and what attachment (stuff, freedom, status, comfort) makes Jesus’ commands feel heavy to you right now?

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.