Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Holy Spirit  /  Why We Should Care About the Holy Spirit  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
Chuck contrasts “the world cannot receive” the Spirit (John 14:17) with believers who “know Him”; what does it mean to “know” the Spirit in a way the world cannot, and how should that reshape how Christians talk about spiritual reality without slipping into either emotionalism or denial?
Another way to ask: What does it mean for believers to “know” the Spirit in a way the world can’t (John 14:17)? How should that change the way Christians talk about spiritual things without getting overly emotional or acting like nothing is real?

Direct Answer In the transcript, to “know” the Spirit means believers recognize and receive the Spirit as God’s real, ongoing presence—“with you” and “in you”—while the world cannot “see” or “know” Him. That should push Christians to speak of spiritual reality as real and necessary, while avoiding both purely emotional subjectivism and the denial that God actively works.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chuck reads John 14:17: the Spirit is “whom the world cannot receive…But you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you.”
  • He explains his background reacted against “Pentecostalism and subjective emotional-based religion,” which led to an “inoculation” approach focused on what the Spirit “doesn’t do.”
  • Yet he also criticizes the opposite extreme: a “mechanical view” where God, Christ, and the Spirit are “not directly intervening in human affairs.”
  • Harding’s illustration reinforces real but unseen work: the Spirit is like “electricity…You can’t see it and it’s mysterious,” yet necessary for power.
  • Chuck’s aim is balanced practicality: understanding the Spirit should “impact how I live,” producing “righteousness and holiness” rooted in who God is.
Discussion Follow-ups How can your church talk about the Spirit as “mysterious but real” (like electricity) without making every feeling a proof? Where have you seen fear of emotionalism become a denial of dependence?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next