Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 6 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Holy Spirit  /  Nature and Character of the Holy Spirit  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 6
In Acts 5, Peter equates lying to the Holy Spirit with lying to God; what does that imply about the Spirit’s personhood (will, agency, relational honesty), and how would your daily speech, hidden motives, or “half-truth” habits look different if you took seriously that the Spirit can be lied to?
Another way to ask: If lying to the Holy Spirit is the same as lying to God (Acts 5), what does that say about the Spirit as someone you can relate to and be honest with? What would change in your words, motives, or half-truths if you took that seriously?

Direct Answer The transcript teaches that the Spirit is personal and divine: you can “lie to the Holy Spirit,” and Peter says this equals lying “to God.” If that’s true, then speech and motives aren’t just private—they are accountable before a relational, holy Person.

Support from Transcript:

  • Acts 5 is central: Peter asks, “Why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit?”
  • Peter then concludes, “You have not lied to men, but to God,” which Chuck says equates the Spirit with God.
  • Chuck draws a clear implication: the Spirit is “divine… therefore worshipped and glorified.”
  • He also insists this proves personhood: “You can lie to the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit has a personality and a will.”
  • This is part of his larger claim that the Spirit is not merely “wind” imagery, nor “an impersonal force like gravity.”
Discussion Follow-ups What kinds of “spiritual half-truths” are common—image management, selective confession, exaggerated stories? How would repentance look if you remembered Chuck’s point: lying is done to God Himself?

Jumpstarter 6 of 10
Back Questions Next