Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Jesus’ wordplay in John 3:8 (“wind blows where it wishes”) and the ambiguity in places like Exodus 15 (wind/Spirit) portray the Spirit as fluid and elusive; what does this reveal about God’s intentions in how He *wants* to be known—especially compared to our preference for control, clarity, and systematized definitions?
Another way to ask: If the Spirit is described like the wind—hard to pin down—what does that show about how God wants to be known? How does that clash with our desire for control and clear definitions?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests God has allowed the Spirit to be revealed with “wind/breath” imagery that resists being boxed into a simple definition, which challenges our desire for total clarity and control. Yet Chuck also insists this “fluid nature” doesn’t make the Spirit impersonal—He has personality, will, and divinity.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chuck says the Spirit is “much more difficult… to understand than the Father and the Son,” partly because He’s described like “wind, breath… like a fluid.”
  • John 3:8 shows intentional wordplay: the same word (*pneuma*) means “wind” and “Spirit,” so Jesus uses ambiguity on purpose.
  • Exodus 15 in the Septuagint can read that the waters were blown back by “the wind or the Spirit,” raising the question: “which one is it there?”
  • Chuck frames the core question: “Is it a force? Is it a person?”
  • He resolves the danger of treating the Spirit as merely elusive: “At the same time, the Holy Spirit is not an impersonal force like gravity… The Holy Spirit has a personality and a will.”
Discussion Follow-ups How can you embrace mystery without sliding into vagueness—especially when Chuck argues the Spirit is personal and divine, not merely an “energy”?