Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Claims of Rome and Eastern Orthodoxy  /  Apostolic Succession – Part 1  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 5
In Acts 6, Bercot emphasizes that Stephen and the seven were already “full of the Holy Spirit” before hands were laid on them; how does that observation confront common modern expectations about when “real ministry authority” or “real spiritual power” begins?
Another way to ask: In Acts 6, Stephen and the others were already full of the Holy Spirit before anyone laid hands on them. How does that challenge the idea that real authority or power starts at ordination?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point is that spiritual reality (being full of the Spirit) preceded the public act of laying on hands, so “real power” did not begin at ordination. This confronts the idea that authority or the Spirit is mainly conferred through an official ceremony.

Support from Transcript:

  • In Acts 6, the apostles tell the church to choose men “of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom, whom we may appoint.”
  • The church chose “Stephen, a man full of faith and the Holy Spirit,” before any laying on of hands is mentioned.
  • After the selection, they “prayed” and “laid hands on them,” but Bercot highlights: “these men like Stephen were already filled with the Holy Spirit. They didn’t receive it after they were ordained.”
  • This observation fits his larger claim that NT “appointments” are not sacramental transfers but recognitions of already evident spiritual life.
  • It also undermines tenets that assume special grace/power is conferred at ordination for administering sacraments.
Discussion Follow-ups How might churches better recognize Spirit-filled service before titles are given, and what safeguards are still needed when appointing leaders?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next