Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Direct Answer Bercot’s Matthew 12 / Isaiah 42 example forces a choice: either accept that the New Testament (and its claim about what Isaiah said) is trustworthy, or accept that the apostles quoted a defective Bible and thereby introduced error into Scripture.

Support from Transcript:

• He says if the Septuagint is “not the true Word of God, and if it is defective, it means that our New Testament contains errors as a result.”
• In Matthew 12:21 the quotation ends, “And in His Name, the Gentiles will trust,” which Bercot says follows the Septuagint of Isaiah 42:1–4.
• He contrasts the Masoretic ending: “And the coastlands shall wait for his law,” noting it “does not say… the Gentiles will trust.”
• He presses the dilemma: “Did Isaiah say… or didn’t he say it? And it’s not a minor point… a very important Messianic prophecy.”
• If Archer’s view is right, then “Isaiah never said those words… Paul is quoting Isaiah in error,” and “the supposed errors… have come into our New Testament.”
• He concludes: since “none of us believe that the New Testament contains error,” then “Isaiah and the other prophets must have said” what the Septuagint records.