Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
After surveying Jesus’ 31 OT quotations, Bercot concludes Jesus usually follows the Septuagint, sometimes the Masoretic Text, and often matches neither word-for-word—then connects this to “jot and tittle” referring to commandments rather than manuscript letters; what practical difference would it make in your life if you treated Jesus’ focus as obedience to God’s commands more than defending exact textual forms, and where would that force changes in how you argue, teach, or evangelize?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Jesus’ OT quotes often don’t match one text word-for-word, and that “jot and tittle” is more about obeying God’s commands than defending exact wording. If you followed Jesus’ focus more, what would change in how you argue, teach, or share your faith?

Direct Answer Bercot’s teaching implies the practical focus should shift from defending one exact textual form to living and teaching God’s preserved commandments and message. If Jesus treated both text traditions as Scripture and still quoted freely, our arguing and teaching should emphasize obedience and meaning over verbal exactness.

Support from Transcript:

  • He surveyed 31 places where Jesus quotes Scripture (“It is written”) and found that most differences between Septuagint and Masoretic have no meaning difference.
  • He reports only five quotations have meaningful differences; in four Jesus follows the Septuagint, and in one (Matt 26:31) he follows the Masoretic more closely.
  • He stresses that “most of the time, Jesus’ quotes don’t match either… word for word,” often differing by more than “a jot or tittle.”
  • He connects this to the objection about “jot and tittle,” saying Jesus was not talking about manuscripts but “the commandments of the law,” promising fuller treatment later.
  • He concludes Jesus “favors” the Septuagint but also “treats [the Masoretic text] as the Word of God as well,” fitting a world where multiple text forms were familiar.
Discussion Follow-ups When you defend the Bible publicly, do you mainly defend its exact form—or do you call people to repentance and to “observe all things” Jesus commanded?