Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Secrets of the Kingdom Life  /  Chapter 3: Naysayers and Half-and-Half Christians  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 4
John Wesley is quoted redefining “gospel liberty” as freedom “from the law of sin,” not freedom “from the law of God”; how would early Christians (pre-Constantine) have heard that claim, and what popular evangelical definitions of “freedom” does it directly confront?
Another way to ask: How would early Christians have understood Wesley’s idea that “freedom” means freedom from sin, not freedom from God’s law? What common church ideas about “freedom” does that challenge?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests early Christians would have heard Wesley’s definition as normal, because before Constantine kingdom living was expected and not viewed as odd within the church. It confronts definitions of “freedom” that treat grace as permission to downplay Christ’s commandments or fear being “under the law of God.”

Support from Transcript:

  • “In the first 300 years… living the kingdom life was the norm.”
  • Kingdom life meant going against “the flow of the world, but not of the church.”
  • Wesley: true liberty is “not freedom from the law of God… but from the law of sin.”
  • “Do not stupidly and senselessly call this legalism.”
  • “Do not be afraid of being under the law of God, but of being under the law of sin.”
  • He adds that believers can “love him and keep his commandments” and find them “the joy of your heart.”
Discussion Follow-ups If early Christians assumed obedience was normal church life, what changed when “the church made enormous compromises with the world,” and how does that reshape what we call “freedom”?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next