Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
When Bercot says believers will label kingdom living “legalistic or fanatical” and even accuse you of “works righteousness,” how does the chapter distinguish “keeping his commandments” from trying to earn salvation, and what parts of that distinction make you uneasy?
Another way to ask: How does the chapter say obeying Jesus’ commands is different from trying to earn salvation? Which part of that difference makes you feel uncomfortable or unsure?

Direct Answer The chapter frames command-keeping as the fruit of faith and Christ’s strengthening power, not a self-powered attempt to earn salvation; it is part of Christ “reigning in your heart” and saving you “from” sin. What may feel uneasy is how strongly it says that refusing obedience signals lack of faith (“you know nothing of Christ”).

Support from Transcript:

  • Critics claim you’re “no Christian at all” because you’re practicing “works righteousness.”
  • Wesley’s line: true liberty is not freedom from God’s law but from “the law of sin.”
  • “Do not say, ‘I can do nothing.’ If so, then you know nothing of Christ. Then you have no faith.”
  • “If you have faith… you can do all things through Christ who strengthens you.”
  • “Show then your love to Christ by keeping his commandments.”
  • Christ’s aim: “He doesn’t want to save us in our sins… but from our sins… now.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you personally draw the line between “Christ strengthens me to obey” and “I’m trying to prove myself”? Does the transcript push you to redraw that line?