Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Discussion Questions

PDF
Tip: Discuss these with your study group.
John Wesley describes people who “walk in all His ordinances” because they have “the fear of God in their heart,” while George MacDonald calls them “good slaves, but slaves”; what picture of God is operating in this chapter—Master, Father, or both—and how does each image reshape the motive behind obedience? JumpstartAnother way to ask: In this chapter, is God pictured more as a Master, a Father, or both? How does seeing God each way change why someone obeys Him?
David Bercot says Type 2 Christians obey from “submission to God, not love of God,” and that the obedience “flows more from their minds… than… from their hearts”; what does the chapter suggest God is actually after in us beyond external compliance, and why would mere submission fall short? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does the chapter say God wants in us besides just following the rules on the outside? Why isn’t simple submission without love enough?
Timothy Toiler “doesn’t pick and choose” because he believes “none of [Christ’s commandments] are optional,” yet he is “largely a stranger to the kingdom life”; what does this expose about the difference between taking Jesus seriously and actually entering the “kingdom life” as Bercot defines it? JumpstartAnother way to ask: If Timothy obeys all of Jesus’ commands but still doesn’t live the “kingdom life,” what’s the difference between taking Jesus seriously and truly entering that life?
Timothy admits he would be glad if Christ abolished many commands and that he would “rather live by the world’s standards, if only God permitted it”; what does the chapter identify as the spiritual problem underneath that desire, and how might that surface in subtle, respectable forms in our own lives? JumpstartAnother way to ask: If Timothy wishes Jesus would remove some commands so he could live like the world, what deeper spiritual issue does the chapter point to? How could that same issue show up in “nice” or respectable ways in us?
In the “What if the Bible wasn’t true?” scenario, Timothy says he wouldn’t “turn the other cheek” and would “relish taking those people to court”; how does this illustration probe whether our obedience is anchored in knowing Christ or merely in biblical authority, and what do you think early Christians would assume about retaliation and lawsuits? JumpstartAnother way to ask: When Timothy says he’d seek revenge and sue people if the Bible weren’t true, what does that reveal about why he obeys—because he knows Christ or just because the Bible has authority? What would early Christians likely think about revenge and lawsuits?
Timothy feels he is “missing out on so much fun” (movies, jokes, football pools, cheating on taxes) and experiences separation in the workplace; how does the chapter challenge the modern Christian assumption that holiness should feel mainly like restriction, and what alternative kind of joy does it hold out? JumpstartAnother way to ask: How does the chapter challenge the idea that holiness is mainly about missing out on fun? What kind of joy does it say is possible instead?
Bercot says Timothy may love God “with all of his mind,” but not “with all of his heart and soul”; what does the chapter imply it means to “love God” in a way that transforms what we want, not just what we do? JumpstartAnother way to ask: What does the chapter say it means to love God in a way that changes what you want, not just what you do? How is that different from loving God only “with your mind”?
Paul’s statement—“I buffet my body and make it my slave… lest… I… should be disqualified”—is used to argue that discipline is normal, yet “we should not have to buffet our bodies in order to obey most of Christ’s commands”; how do you reconcile discipline with “Christ’s yoke is easy,” and what would early Christians likely assume “easy” means (and doesn’t mean)? JumpstartAnother way to ask: How can self-discipline be normal and still fit with Jesus saying His yoke is easy? What do you think early Christians meant by “easy,” and what didn’t they mean?
Type 2 obedience is compared to an arranged marriage that is faithful but lacks warmth; where have you seen “cold and spiritless Christianity” produced by duty-driven obedience, and what concrete signs would reveal that a person or community is functioning more like servants than sons? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Where have you seen a cold, duty-only Christianity that lacks warmth and joy? What clear signs show someone is acting more like a servant than a son or daughter of God?
The chapter describes four burnout paths—quitting Christianity, reverting to Type 1 “salvation issues only,” becoming Pharisaic fault-finders, or embracing “easy believism” that ignores hard commands; which of these seems most tempting in contemporary evangelical culture, and what specific practices or shifts in motive does the chapter imply are necessary to move into “love obedience” instead? JumpstartAnother way to ask: Which burnout path seems most common today: quitting, focusing only on “salvation issues,” becoming judgmental, or ignoring hard commands with “easy believism”? What changes in habits or motives does the chapter suggest are needed to move into love-based obedience?

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.

Discussion Jumpstarter

Discussion stalled? Read the Jumpstarter for help getting conversation flowing again.