Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 1
Paul anticipates the objection “Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound?”—what specific misunderstandings of grace does the lesson say lead to that conclusion, and where do you see those same misunderstandings showing up in present-day Christian language or practice?
Another way to ask: What wrong ideas about grace does the lesson say lead people to think, “If God forgives, we can keep sinning”? Where do you see those same wrong ideas in Christian talk or habits today?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, the misunderstanding is thinking grace means Christians can keep living in sin after receiving God’s initial pardon, as if forgiveness is meant to cover ongoing, chosen sin without a changed life.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says Paul’s readers could “through careless reading… imagine that because of grace, Christians can keep living in sin after receiving God’s initial pardon.”
  • Paul’s answer is decisive: “God forbid… how will we, who are dead to sin, live any longer in it?”
  • Grace means “committing ourselves to die to sin” and rising from baptism to “a new life of holiness.”
  • Ambrosiaster frames the wrong idea as: “Do we keep sinning so that grace will abound even more by forgiving us these new sins? Certainly not.”
  • Bercot contrasts true repentance with “a superficial altar call, where a person merely acknowledges that he is a sinner” without intending “thereafter [to] liv[e] a righteous life.”
Discussion Follow-ups The transcript doesn’t list modern phrases, but it invites us to examine whether our church practices encourage mere acknowledgment without a commitment to “sin no more.”

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next