Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
The lesson’s “bank robber before the judge” illustration mocks the idea that wrongdoing deserves praise because it makes goodness look better; where do Christians subtly use the same logic—treating their sin as spiritually useful, inevitable, or somehow beneficial to God’s plan—and what does Paul’s “God forbid” confront in those habits?
Another way to ask: Where do Christians act like their sin is actually helpful—like it’s “useful,” unavoidable, or part of God’s plan? What does Paul’s strong “God forbid” say to that way of thinking?

Direct Answer The transcript confronts the habit of excusing sin by claiming it highlights God’s righteousness or serves a greater good; Paul’s “God forbid” denies that sin is justified just because God’s perfection is seen more clearly in contrast.

Support from Transcript:

  • The opponent argues: “If our unrighteousness displays the righteousness of God…God is unjust who inflicts wrath.”
  • Origen explains the logic: sins “highlighted God’s own faithfulness,” so God supposedly has “no grounds to be wrathful.”
  • Paul rejects it: “God forbid…just because our sins cause God’s perfection to stand out…this in no way excuses our sin.”
  • The bank-robber illustration: the criminal claims he does society a favor by making “law-abiding citizens look good,” which the teacher calls “obviously ludicrous.”
  • The transcript concludes, “All God’s judgments are righteous,” citing: “You are righteous, O Lord, and your judgments are upright.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you hear versions of “my sin helped me” becoming an excuse not to change? How does the certainty that God “will judge the world” cut off that reasoning?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next