Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 7
The opponent’s claim is read as an assertion—“God is unrighteous who inflicts wrath”—and Paul distances himself with “I speak in the manner of men”; what does this reveal about how Paul handles blasphemous-sounding objections without softening them, and how should that shape the way Christians address hard questions about wrath and judgment?
Another way to ask: Paul repeats a shocking objection (“God is wrong to punish”) and then says he’s speaking like people do. What does that show about how he deals with hard, even offensive questions, and how should Christians talk about wrath and judgment today?

Direct Answer The transcript portrays Paul as stating the objection plainly (even when it sounds blasphemous) and then explicitly distancing himself from it, so Christians can face hard questions honestly while still rejecting irreverent conclusions about God’s wrath.

Support from Transcript:

  • The teacher notes early Christians read “God is unjust who inflicts wrath” as an assertion, not a question.
  • Paul adds, “I speak in the manner of men,” to clarify it is “the opponent’s assertion, not his own.”
  • Theodoret is quoted: Paul “introduces an argument through the person of his opponent” because he must address objections.
  • Paul “immediately disavows it,” essentially saying, “It is not I who speak in this manner.”
  • Paul’s response is emphatic: “God forbid,” followed by the reasoning: “for then how will God judge the world?”
Discussion Follow-ups How can we repeat an objection accurately without endorsing it? What practices help us discuss wrath and judgment with “apostolic reverence” rather than defensiveness or flippancy?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next