Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 3
Origen is quoted saying God’s promises go to the person who “descends from Abraham according to the promise of faith”; what assumptions about faith, righteousness, and belonging did early Christians appear to take for granted that many modern Christians might resist?
Another way to ask: Origen says God’s promises belong to the one who shares Abraham’s faith, not just his bloodline. What beliefs about faith, being right with God, and belonging did early Christians assume that many Christians today might push back on?

Direct Answer Early Christians in the transcript assume belonging to God’s people is faith-defined rather than bloodline-defined, and that righteousness matters more to God than “nature.” Many modern Christians might resist the strong claim that ancestry or religious status counts for nothing if faith is absent.

Support from Transcript:

  • Origen: the true Israelite isn’t merely someone who can trace “fleshly ancestry back to Abraham.”
  • Origen: “it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God,” but the one who descends “according to the promise of faith.”
  • Origen: the one of faith “will obtain God’s promises,” implying promises are tied to faith, not ethnicity.
  • Bercot quotes Otteret: “God does not seek the relationship of nature, but of righteousness.”
  • Bercot’s summary fits this assumption: “Genetic descent means nothing… only those who follow Christ are the children of promise.”
Discussion Follow-ups How does this early-Christian way of speaking challenge modern ideas that God must treat people as “in” based on heritage, labels, or group membership?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next