Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 1
Paul anticipates the Jewish objection, “Has the Word of God taken no effect?” after Israel rejected the Messiah; what does Paul’s answer (“they are not all Israel who are of Israel”) reveal about God’s faithfulness to promises when an entire covenant people proves unfaithful?
Another way to ask: When Israel rejected the Messiah, Paul says, “Not all who come from Israel are really Israel.” What does this show about how God keeps His promises even when His covenant people are unfaithful?

Direct Answer Paul’s answer shows that God’s promises have not failed, because the promises were always aimed at the “true Israel,” not every ethnic descendant. Even when many in the covenant people reject the Messiah, God remains faithful by fulfilling His word to those who belong to Israel “inwardly”—those of faith.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot frames the objection: Israel rejected “their promise Messiah,” so Jews might ask, “Does this mean that the Word of God has taken no effect?”
  • Paul’s reply: “Not at all… ‘They are not all Israel who are of Israel.’”
  • He ties it to Romans 2: “He is not a Jew who is one outwardly… but… inwardly… circumcision… of the heart.”
  • “The true Israel, the Israel of God, is comprised of both believing Jews and believing Gentiles.”
  • “All the promises are still in effect for those Jews who are part of the Israel of God.”
Discussion Follow-ups If God’s promises are tied to faith rather than ethnicity, how should Christians speak about God’s faithfulness without assuming God is obligated to bless unbelief?