Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 7 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Romans Commentary Chapters 9-16  /  Romans 9:17-18 the Hardening of Pharaoh  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 7
The lesson argues God’s actions toward Pharaoh were “neutral,” and that “other rulers would have repented under the same circumstances” (King of Nineveh); what does this imply about miracles, evidence, and spiritual experiences—why do they soften some people and harden others?
Another way to ask: If God treated Pharaoh in a “neutral” way and another ruler might have repented, what does that say about miracles and spiritual experiences? Why do they soften some people but harden others?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests miracles and spiritual experiences are like a single “neutral” stimulus: they don’t force one outcome, but reveal and intensify the condition of a person’s will—softening the receptive and hardening the stubborn.

Support from Transcript:

  • The lesson concludes: “God’s actions were neutral,” and Pharaoh’s hardness came from “his own wickedness.”
  • “Other rulers would have repented under the same circumstances,” illustrated by “the King of Nineveh,” who repented “merely on hearing” Jonah.
  • Nineveh’s king “did not even witness any miracles the way Pharaoh did,” yet responded, showing evidence alone doesn’t guarantee repentance.
  • Origen: by “the very same act,” God “has pity upon one individual, but hardens another,” not because God desires hardening.
  • Origen likens miracles to “rain”: the same rain produces crops in cultivated soil but “thorns and thistles” in neglected soil; the difference is not the rain but the cultivation.
Discussion Follow-ups If experiences don’t automatically change hearts, what should we prioritize more than chasing the next “proof” or dramatic event?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next