Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Romans Commentary Chapters 9-16  /  Romans 9:17-18 the Hardening of Pharaoh  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
David Bercot stresses that God’s aim was not self-exaltation but the salvation of those who would hear about Him through the Exodus drama; where do you see modern Christianity subtly assuming God’s chief motive is “glory” in a way that can feel detached from His desire to save actual people?
Another way to ask: Bercot says God’s goal was saving people, not showing off. Where do you see Christians today acting like God mainly wants “glory,” in a way that forgets real people He wants to save?

Direct Answer The transcript’s main corrective is that God’s “name being declared” is tied to saving real hearers, so any modern emphasis on “glory” that ignores people’s salvation would be out of step with the lesson’s emphasis.

Support from Transcript:

  • The transcript explicitly rejects a detached “glory” motive: God acted “not because God was seeking self-exaltation.”
  • Instead, God’s purpose was relational and evangelistic: “He cared about the salvation of those who would hear about Him through these events.”
  • God’s tolerance of Pharaoh is framed as patient strategy: “he tolerated him so my name might be declared throughout all the earth.”
  • The outcome is described in people-focused terms: Egyptians “came to know the true God,” and later “millions… have learned about God.”
  • Even judgment is portrayed as serving others: punishment was used “for the correction of others, making them better.”
Discussion Follow-ups The transcript doesn’t list modern examples, but where might church language about “God’s glory” become disconnected from evangelism, repentance, and actual rescue?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next