Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 2
David Bercot argues that quoting Exodus (“I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy”) is not God claiming arbitrary mercy but wise mercy informed by hearts and outcomes; what in the golden calf episode supports that reading, and what in the text might tempt someone toward the “arbitrary” reading he warns against?
Another way to ask: In the golden calf story, what shows that God’s mercy is wise and based on people’s hearts and results, not random? What part of the story might still make someone think God’s mercy is arbitrary?

Direct Answer The golden calf episode supports “wise mercy” because God punishes a specific group while sparing the rest, and later repentance results—suggesting purpose and discernment. The wording “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy” can tempt people to hear sheer sovereignty with no reasons given.

Support from Transcript:

  • Context: Israel “had just terribly sinned by worshipping the golden calf,” and God “would have been justified” to abandon or slay them.
  • Yet judgment is limited: “the Levites slay only 3,000 men,” and “God had mercy on the rest…He let them live.”
  • Bercot warns: God did not say, “I will arbitrarily have mercy…arbitrarily have compassion,” stressing “God knew the hearts of all those involved.”
  • Ambrosiaster: perhaps God punished the 3,000 because “He knew they would not repent.”
  • The Otteret: punishing only some “caused the remaining Israelites to repent,” showing outcomes tied to mercy/judgment.
  • What tempts an arbitrary reading: the Exodus quote itself gives no explicit explanation—“I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious.”
Discussion Follow-ups How do we avoid adding words (“arbitrarily”) while also avoiding projecting human favoritism onto God when Scripture doesn’t explain all the reasons?