Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 1
Paul opens with, “We then who are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak and not to please ourselves”; in the specific Jew/Gentile tension about Torah-regulations, what would “bearing” look like in daily church life, and what kinds of sacrifices by the “strong” does Paul seem to assume are normal?
Another way to ask: In the Jew/Gentile arguments about Torah rules, what would it look like for the “strong” to carry the “weak” in everyday church life? What normal sacrifices does Paul expect the “strong” to make?

Direct Answer “Bearing” would mean Gentile believers patiently limiting their own freedom so they do not offend Jewish believers who are still “clinging to regulations of the law,” and choosing the other person’s spiritual good over self-pleasing.

Support from Transcript:

  • Paul is continuing the prior chapter’s issue: “the Gentile believers should not offend their weaker Jewish brethren who were still clinging to regulations of the law.”
  • The command is explicit: “We then who are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak and not to please ourselves.”
  • David Bercot says “stronger Christians must patiently bear with the weaknesses and faults of weaker Christians.”
  • He connects it to imitation of Christ: “If we do not, we are not imitators of Christ.”
  • The aim is not mere tolerance but benefit: “Let each of us please his neighbor for his good to his edification.”
  • The model is Christ who “did not please Himself,” but accepted reproach and suffering for others.
Discussion Follow-ups What “rights” or preferences do you treat as non-negotiable, even when they damage unity? What would it look like to deliberately choose edification over being understood?