Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 1
David Bercot warns that Paul “writes more like a prophet than like an attorney,” making it easy to twist isolated phrases; what examples from Romans 14:14 (and Peter’s warning about “untaught and unstable people”) show why context controls interpretation, and where do you see modern Christians repeating the Gnostics’ mistake in different forms?
Another way to ask: How does Romans 14:14 show that you can’t take one line from Paul without its context (like Peter warned)? Where do you see Christians today making a similar mistake by twisting Scripture or mixing in “secret knowledge” like the Gnostics did?

Direct Answer Bercot’s point is that Romans 14:14 can be made to “say” almost anything if it’s lifted out of its food context, which is exactly what Peter warned would happen with Paul’s letters. In the transcript, the Gnostics (and some modern Christians) repeat the same error by using “nothing unclean in itself” to deny real moral uncleanness.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says Paul’s style makes it “extremely easy for people to twist isolated texts,” and that “from the first century on, heretics have selectively quoted Paul.”
  • He cites Peter’s warning that “untaught and unstable people twist [Paul] to their own destruction.”
  • Example of twisting: “The Gnostics twisted the subject verse to argue that no sin, even sexual immorality, is unclean in itself.”
  • He says the correct control is context: “such interpretations ignore Paul’s context. Here Paul is still speaking about foods.”
  • He ties the “unclean” issue to settled apostolic teaching: Jesus “purifying all foods,” Peter’s vision (“What God has cleansed you must not call unclean”), and the Council of Jerusalem’s limited food prohibitions.
Discussion Follow-ups Bercot doesn’t list specific modern examples beyond saying some “distort it in similar ways,” so a leader may need to ask the group where they’ve seen verses used to excuse what Scripture elsewhere calls sin.