Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
“Make no provision for the flesh to fulfill its desires” is clarified as not forbidding provision for needs but forbidding going beyond necessity—illustrated by drunkenness, gluttony, pride in dress, softness, luxury, even “effeminacy,” and Clement’s counsel for plain, clean, non-luxurious clothing; what specific “provisions” in your lifestyle (food, alcohol, entertainment, spending, comfort, appearance) are most likely to be rationalized as “needs,” and what would repentance look like without sliding into mere rule-keeping?
Another way to ask: “Make no provision for the flesh” means not going beyond real needs, like with food, alcohol, entertainment, spending, comfort, or appearance. Which of these do you most excuse as a “need,” and what would real repentance look like without turning it into simple rule-keeping?

Direct Answer The transcript points to “provisions” most easily rationalized as needs as excesses in food and drink, luxury and softness, prideful attention to dress, and indulgent entertainments that feed fleshly desires. Repentance would mean re-centering on what is “necessary,” choosing plainness and moderation, and making practical changes to stop feeding desires—while aiming to “put on…Jesus Christ,” not just follow rules.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chrysostom: Paul “does not forbid making provision for the flesh… he forbids doing so with a view to fulfill its desires,” meaning going “beyond the things necessary.”
  • Examples given: “drunkards, the gluttons, those who pride themselves in dress… live a soft and luxurious life.”
  • The lesson earlier ties excess to pagan feasts: drunkenness leads to wantonness and quarrels.
  • Clement on clothing: “proper dress… plain, becoming, and clean,” “not… immodest or luxuriant.”
  • The controlling positive command is relational: “put on the Lord Jesus Christ,” letting Him “totally envelop us.”
Discussion Follow-ups What is one concrete “beyond necessity” area you could cut back this week? How can you frame that change as putting on Christ (newness of life) rather than merely managing behavior?