Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 3

Cyprian says, “it is not lawful for the innocent to kill even those who are guilty,” and describes the Christian fleeing rage “as if fleeing from the storms of the sea”; how does that push against common Christian justifications for violence, and where do you feel internal resistance to his logic?

Another way to ask: How does Cyprian’s claim that it’s wrong for even the innocent to kill the guilty challenge common Christian reasons for using violence? Where do you feel yourself pushing back against what he says?

Direct Answer Based on the lesson, Cyprian’s logic rejects violence even when it feels justified by guilt, innocence, or moral outrage; the Christian must flee rage and refuse killing, not merely avoid “unjust” killing. The internal resistance often comes where we feel safety, justice, or protection requires force.

Support from Transcript:

Cyprian: “Christians do not attack their assailants in retaliation.”
He states the principle broadly: “it is not lawful for the innocent to kill even those who are guilty.”
He describes a Christian posture: fleeing “rage and fleshly strife as if fleeing from the storms of the sea,” having found “tranquility and meekness in the harbor of Christ.”
Therefore the Christian “should allow neither anger nor conflict within his heart,” and “must neither return evil for evil nor bear hatred.”
The larger frame is Jesus’ teaching echoed by Paul: “do not resist evil… turn the other [cheek].”

Discussion Follow-ups Where do we most want to carve out exceptions—protecting family, stopping criminals, punishing the guilty? How much of our resistance is about fear and anger versus a sincere concern for others’ good?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 3 of 10