Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
Chrysostom is quoted denying that Gentiles would “never have been called,” but saying they came in “ahead of the Jews” out of order; what does this teach about God’s timing and strategy in salvation history, and how should it humble Gentile believers who might assume they are the “default” people of God?
Another way to ask: What does this say about God’s timing in saving people, and how should it humble Gentile believers who think they are God’s “default” people?

Direct Answer The transcript teaches that Gentile inclusion was always part of God’s plan, but the timing shifted because of Jewish unbelief: Gentiles came in “ahead of the Jews,” not as God’s replacement plan but as an out-of-order sequence used to provoke Israel. This should humble Gentile believers because their early inclusion is described as a consequence of Israel’s stumble, not a reason for Gentile pride.

Support from Transcript:

  • The lesson asks: “Does this mean that the Gentiles would have never been saved if not for the unbelief of the Jews? Of course not.”
  • Chrysostom: Paul is not saying “we Gentiles would never have been called at all…No.”
  • Chrysostom: “we would not have come in ahead of the Jews, but in our proper order.”
  • “The Jews should have been the first ones admitted as a people, and then we should have followed.”
  • “The Gentiles have largely been saved ahead of the Jews, in order to provoke them to jealousy.”
  • The parables show the kingdom is given to others because of Jewish unfaithfulness, reinforcing that Gentiles should not presume entitlement.
Discussion Follow-ups What attitudes today resemble assuming we are the “default” people of God? How might gratitude replace superiority when we remember why the order changed?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next