Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 9
On “the Lord is rich to all who call upon Him,” Ambrosiaster says God is generous “only to those who call upon Him,” and the lesson adds that He grants both salvation and “various eternal rewards”; how does this early Christian way of speaking about generosity, calling, and rewards differ from evangelical instincts about equal outcomes for all believers?
Another way to ask: How is the early Christian idea—God is generous to those who call on him, and he gives different rewards—different from the idea that all believers end up with the same outcome? What does that difference change about how you think of salvation and reward?

Direct Answer The transcript presents God’s generosity as real and lavish but also conditioned: He is “rich” toward those who truly call on Him, granting salvation and even “various eternal rewards,” which implies differences in reward rather than equal outcomes for everyone.

Support from Transcript:

  • Romans 10:12 is explained: God “is rich to all who call upon Him,” meaning “God is generous to all who call upon Him.”
  • Bercot adds God rewards them “lavishly by granting them the gift of salvation and by bestowing various eternal rewards.”
  • Ambrosiaster: “He is generous only to those who call upon Him, for only they will receive a reward.”
  • “By contrast, to unbelievers, He is not generous… they will not receive what they did not believe He was going to give them.”
  • The lesson elsewhere resists blanket assurance apart from obedience, which frames “calling” as meaningful and not automatic.
Discussion Follow-ups How does the idea of “various eternal rewards” affect the way we think about discipleship and perseverance? What might modern Christians lose if we collapse everything into identical outcomes?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next