Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 9

Romans 10:4 is explained with two meanings of *telos*: Christ as the conclusion of the law and Christ as the purpose the law aimed at; when you read the Old Testament, what would it look like to treat Christ as both the end-point and the goal—especially in areas where Christians today still argue over “clean/unclean” categories, rituals, and boundary markers?

Another way to ask: What would change if you read the Old Testament as pointing to Christ as both the end of the law and the goal of the law? How might that affect debates today about clean/unclean rules, rituals, and who is “in” or “out”?

Direct Answer Treating Christ as *telos* means reading the Old Testament as both completed in Christ (no longer binding as a righteousness-system) and pointing toward Christ as its intended goal. In disputed areas like clean/unclean or rituals, the transcript’s logic pushes Christians to see those categories as shadows fulfilled and clarified by Christ.

Support from Transcript:

Bercot explains *telos* can mean “conclusion”: Christ “brought [the law] to a conclusion” and “completed the law.”
He also explains *telos* as “object or purpose”: the law’s purpose was “always intended to lead people to Christ.”
He cites Galatians: “The law has become our guardian to bring us to Christ.”
Novatian connects completion to shadow-categories: references “clean and unclean animals” returning to “original blessedness now that the law is completed.”
Theodoret: the law “directed us to the Lord Christ,” so trusting Christ fulfills the law’s intention.

Discussion Follow-ups When an Old Testament rule feels important, do you ask first how Christ fulfills it? How might “end” and “goal” change the tone of debates over boundary markers?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 9 of 10