Skip to content
The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 8
Justin Martyr’s conversion story centers on being confronted with the prophets as Spirit-filled witnesses and then feeling “a flame…kindled” and a love for the prophets; what would it mean for someone today to be drawn to Christ through the prophets rather than primarily through personal testimony or felt experience, and how might your church culture either help or hinder that path?
Another way to ask: What would it look like today for someone to come to Christ mainly through the prophets, not mainly through personal stories or feelings? In what ways might your church culture help that happen—or make it harder?

Direct Answer In Chuck’s telling, being drawn through the prophets means being convinced by the public witness of Spirit-inspired writings that foretold and now match Christ, and then developing a genuine love for Scripture’s prophetic voice. A church helps this path when it teaches and uses prophecy as evidence like the early Christians did, and hinders it when it treats prophecy as irrelevant or merely academic.

Support from Transcript:

  • Justin is described as a philosopher from Samaria, “originally an unbeliever,” converted after an elderly Christian challenged him.
  • Justin’s key claim: prophets “spoke by the divine spirit and foretold events…now taking place…being filled with the Holy Spirit.”
  • Justin says, “Their writings are still extant. He who has read them is very much helped.”
  • Conversion effect: “a flame was kindled in my soul and a love of the prophets…possess me.”
  • Chuck says Justin later preached to Roman leaders using “the evidence of the fulfilled prophecies,” listing predicted events including “crucified, dying and rising again.”
Discussion Follow-ups Would your church’s preaching make room for someone to fall in love with “the prophets,” or would they have to pursue that alone? What would change if seekers were invited to investigate prophecy as “evidence,” not just inspirational material?