Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
Bercot lists traits of legalism (minor over major, external over internal) and then argues many anti-“legalism” Christians are actually legalistic in a different way—using the “letter” to find loopholes (child “picked up toys but put them back,” Pharisees’ oath loopholes in Matthew 23:16–18); what loopholes do modern Christians use to neutralize Jesus’ commands while claiming faithfulness, and what would it look like this week to close one specific loophole in your own life in a way that is obedience—not Pharisaic rule-keeping?
Another way to ask: What “loopholes” do Christians use today to get around Jesus’ commands while still claiming they obey? What is one loophole you could close this week in a way that is real obedience, not picky rule-keeping?

Direct Answer Bercot warns that another form of legalism uses technical readings to escape Jesus’ intent—finding “loopholes” while claiming faithfulness. Closing a loophole means stopping the word-games and obeying the real purpose of Christ’s command with sincerity, not by inventing new rules to look spiritual.

Support from Transcript:

  • He describes loophole-legalism: following the “letter…for the purpose of finding a loophole around what the Spirit is.”
  • Child example: “I picked them up, but then I put them back down…You didn’t say I had to put them away,” illustrating technical compliance that defeats the command.
  • He says Christians do this to argue “the whole thing is void,” pretending it’s “grace” but actually “very legalistic.”
  • Pharisee oath loopholes (Matt. 23:16–18): swearing by temple is “nothing,” but by gold is binding—Jesus calls them “fools and blind.”
  • He ties legalism to externalism: Pharisees do works “to be seen,” and Jesus demands inner cleansing.
  • The transcript begins an example about idols in Catholic/Orthodox practice, but it’s truncated, so we can’t fully develop his application.
Discussion Follow-ups What is one command of Jesus you tend to technically redefine (like “love,” “enemy,” “forgive,” “strive”) to reduce its force? What concrete act of obedience this week would fulfill the intent (spirit) without becoming a new badge of superiority?