Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 9 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Christian Living  /  How Obedience Can Become Pharisaism  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 9
Bercot argues that Acts 15 is not a precedent for creating new extra-biblical burdens but the opposite (“lay upon you no greater burden”), and he says it scares him when someone insists, “We wouldn’t see them as extra-biblical”; what would change in your church culture if you clearly separated (a) direct commandments of God from (b) your group’s applications, and what fears come up when you imagine making that distinction explicit?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Acts 15 is about not adding extra burdens, not about creating new ones. What would change if your church clearly said which rules are God’s direct commands and which are your group’s applications, and what fears does that bring up?

Direct Answer Bercot implies that clearly separating God’s commands from group applications would reduce Pharisaic confusion and judgment, but it may also raise fears of losing the “protective hedge” that has helped preserve obedience amid widespread church apostasy.

Support from Transcript:

  • He condemns equating rules with God’s commands: Christ condemns “equating our man-made rules with God’s commandments.”
  • He says it “really, really scared” him when someone said, “We wouldn’t see them as extra biblical.”
  • He argues Acts 15 does the opposite of adding rules: “lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things,” listing only four items.
  • He emphasizes the council “stripped away really everything in the law,” not creating new applications as binding.
  • He suggests a practical exercise: review standards and ask, “how many…are actually specific commandments of God?” and recognize many are “reasonable applications.”
  • He acknowledges a fear-driven motivation: extra standards have produced “good fruit,” and “about the only churches who obey” are those with extra rules.
Discussion Follow-ups If your church openly labeled some standards as “our application,” would members interpret that as compromise—or as honesty and humility?

Jumpstarter 9 of 10
Back Questions Next