Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 4

When Bercot lists Jesus’ chasm #2 condemnations—fixation on minutiae over mercy, externals over inner life, elevating traditions to God’s commands, and rules that negate God’s commands—which of these feels most plausible in your fellowship, and what makes it hard to admit?

Another way to ask: Jesus condemned the Pharisees for focusing on tiny rules over mercy, outward looks over the heart, and traditions over God’s commands. Which of these seems most likely in your group, and why is it hard to admit?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s emphasis, the most plausible dangers in “radical discipleship” fellowships are elevating traditions to the level of God’s commands and focusing heavily on externals, because these can feel like “faithfulness” while quietly training us toward judgment and blindness.

Support from Transcript:

He lists four chasm #2 issues: minutiae over “love and mercy,” externals over “inner person,” treating traditions “as though they were actually commandments of God,” and rules that “negated God’s commandments.”
He admits chasm #2 is where he is “most blind,” especially among those who “take very seriously the commandments of Jesus.”
He observes most standards focus on outward things: “dress…grooming…transportation…the color of our vehicles…the color of our clothes.”
He says this leads to sizing people up externally: we think we can “size them up spiritually…by how they look outwardly.”
He warns about confusion of standards and Scripture: a brother said, “We wouldn’t see them as extra biblical,” and Bercot says “that really, really scared me.”

Discussion Follow-ups What would be hardest for your group to say out loud: “This is our application, not God’s command”?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 4 of 10