Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 3
Bercot describes the Pharisees as originally “the good guys,” a reform movement trying to protect God’s law by building a “hedge”; what does that origin story reveal about how sincere spiritual goals can still lead to something Jesus condemns, and where do you see similar dynamics in your own church tradition?
Another way to ask: The Pharisees started as a sincere reform group trying to protect God’s law. What does that teach you about how good goals can still lead to something Jesus condemns, and where do you see that risk in your church tradition?

Direct Answer Bercot’s origin story shows that sincere efforts to safeguard obedience can slowly turn into a dangerous system of expanding man-made rules that produce self-righteousness, misplace priorities, and eventually draw Jesus’ strongest condemnation.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says the Pharisees “did not start off as the bad guys” but as a reform movement when Jews were adopting “pagan Greek customs.”
  • Their stated goal was protection: “Let’s build a hedge around the law…draw a line on the safe side.”
  • Over time the hedge grew into “minute detail” (beggar bowl rules, four cubits throwing limit, smoothing a mattress, filing fingernails, killing a flea, setting a broken leg).
  • This produced “a huge amount of extra biblical tradition,” later written as the “Mishna” and “Talmud.”
  • Despite their confidence Messiah would praise them, Jesus “condemned them in the harshest language.”
  • He parallels Christian groups (Anabaptists, Puritans) using the same “hedge approach,” which “does produce some genuine results” but is “inherently dangerous.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where have your group’s “helpful safeguards” expanded into identity markers that tempt you to judge others?