Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 4 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Christian Living  /  Gossip: Not a Minor Sin  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 4
He says there is “one exception and one exception only” to the litmus test—church discipline following Jesus’ three-step process; how does his description of discipline (private if possible, aimed at rescue not humiliation) challenge the way modern Christians often “process” concerns by talking to friends first?
Another way to ask: How does Bercot’s view of church discipline—start private, aim to restore, not embarrass—challenge the habit of talking to friends first when you’re worried about someone?

Direct Answer Bercot says the only time you may share something a person wouldn’t want shared is formal church discipline, and even that begins privately with the person—not with friends. His emphasis on rescue and privacy challenges the common habit of “processing” by spreading the issue as prayer talk or venting.

Support from Transcript:

  • He states: “There is one exception and one exception only… and that is in matters of church discipline.”
  • Jesus’ first step is personal, not social: “Go and talk to that brother alone… He didn’t say, ‘Go and talk to other people.’”
  • If they won’t listen: “Bring somebody else… normally… someone in church leadership.”
  • Only then: “bring it up to the church… for the church to officially handle it… not by going around and gossiping.”
  • Purpose is redemption: “always for the benefit to save your brother… to rescue them, not to humiliate them… done privately if possible.”
Discussion Follow-ups When you feel burdened about someone’s sin, who is your first instinct to talk to? How would your church’s conflicts change if everyone obeyed the “alone… then leadership… then church” order?

Jumpstarter 4 of 10
Back Questions Next