Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 3 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Radical Christian Living  /  Gossip: Not a Minor Sin  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 3
Bercot’s “litmus test” is: “Would that person want me to tell others what I’m about to say?”—how would applying that single question reshape common church conversations, and where do you feel resistance to letting that test rule your speech?
Another way to ask: How would church talk change if we always asked, “Would they want me to share this?” Where do you feel yourself pushing back against that rule for your words?

Direct Answer Applying Bercot’s test would shut down most negative, private talk and replace it with upbuilding speech or silence, because many comments we pass along are things the person would not want shared. Resistance often shows up where we enjoy “interesting” talk, want sympathy, or feel entitled to share.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot’s test is explicit: “Would that person want me to tell others what I’m about to say? If not, then don’t say it, period.”
  • He insists truth doesn’t excuse it: “Doesn’t matter if it’s true or not.”
  • He contrasts rare positive talk with typical patterns: “good news rarely travels as fast… as bad news does.”
  • He describes gossip as “one of the most pervasive sins… yet… treated like… a respectable sin.”
  • He diagnoses the pull toward gossip as entertainment: people gossip because it “makes for entertaining conversation… something interesting to talk about.”
Discussion Follow-ups Where do you feel tempted to make an exception—when you’re “just venting,” asking for sympathy, or trying to be interesting? What would change if you used this test before every story?

Jumpstarter 3 of 10
Back Questions Next