Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion

Question 2

Bercot argues that the early Christians before Nicaea were “all kingdom Christians” and yet “converted people right and left” who had “no belief whatsoever in the God of the Bible”; what assumptions about God’s power, the Spirit’s work, and the plausibility of radical obedience seem to have been normal for early believers but are often absent in kingdom churches today?

Another way to ask: Bercot says the early Christians (before Nicaea) obeyed Jesus boldly and still converted many people. What did they seem to assume about God’s power, the Spirit’s work, and obeying Jesus that many kingdom churches today don’t assume?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests early believers assumed the Holy Spirit truly could bring outright pagans to full surrender and radical obedience, so they didn’t treat evangelism as unrealistic for “sermon-on-the-mount” Christianity.

Support from Transcript:

Bercot contrasts modern kingdom churches with early Christians: early believers “converted people right and left…people who had no belief whatsoever in the God of the Bible.”
He says we should “never imagine that evangelism just doesn’t work for kingdom Christians” or that it’s “too hard” to bring someone “straight out of the world” to embrace “all of His teachings.”
He acknowledges human weakness but emphasizes divine power: “of course, we can’t do that in our own power, but the Holy Spirit has the power to do it.”
He points to repeated historical precedent: “It’s been done over and over and over again through the centuries.”
He appeals to Acts as a normal mindset: scattered disciples “wherever they went…talked about the kingdom of God…They preached Christ…they were all doing this.”

Discussion Follow-ups Do we quietly assume radical obedience is only plausible for children raised in the church rather than for new converts?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Add your phone number?

Thank you!

Jumpstarter 2 of 10