Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 8
Chuck ties the Passover lamb to ethics: Paul uses “Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed” to argue for removing sexual immorality and “yeast” from the church; what would it look like for a church today to treat Christ’s sacrifice as a reason for aggressive communal purity rather than as permission to be more relaxed about sin?
Another way to ask: Paul says Christ is our Passover lamb and uses that to push the church to remove sexual sin and “yeast.” What would it look like today for a church to treat Jesus’ sacrifice as a reason for strong group holiness instead of being more relaxed about sin?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests a church should treat Christ’s sacrifice like Passover: because the Lamb has been sacrificed, God’s people remove “yeast” (sin) decisively, not casually tolerate it. In Chuck’s example, Paul applies this directly to refusing sexual immorality in the church.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chuck quotes Paul: “For Christ, our Passover lamb has been sacrificed.”
  • He explains Paul’s ethical use: “He’s talking about sexual immorality… ‘so now we eat the bread without yeast,’ which means you get the sin out.”
  • Chuck’s conclusion: “We can’t have immorality in the church.”
  • Passover pattern: after the lamb was sacrificed “for the next seven days, they’d remove all the yeast from the house.”
  • He states the meaning: “yeast represents sin… it spreads, it contaminates… it takes over everything.”
Discussion Follow-ups What “yeast” do churches often excuse today, and what would it mean to address it as seriously as Paul does in the Passover argument?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next