Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 5
The transcript emphasizes that Jews (then and now) stumble over a crucified Messiah and that Muslims deny the crucifixion outright (Surah 4); when you hear those objections, what part of the cross feels most offensive or implausible to you personally—shame, weakness, substitution, God’s justice, or something else?
Another way to ask: Jews often reject a crucified Messiah, and Muslims deny the crucifixion. When you hear those objections, what part of the cross feels most shocking or hard to believe to you—shame, weakness, substitution, God’s justice, or something else?

Direct Answer Chuck’s focus suggests the most offensive and implausible part is the shame and dishonor of the crucifixion itself—that the promised King would be “so shamefully crucified” and die a death “cursed by the law.” He presents this as the key obstacle for Jews and as flatly denied by Islam, forcing Christians to face how scandalous the cross really is.

Support from Transcript:

  • Paul’s line: “Christ crucified is a stumbling block to the Jews.”
  • Trypho’s objection (quoted): “whether Christ should be so shamefully crucified… prove to us by the Scriptures… die so disgracefully and so dishonorably by the death cursed by the law.”
  • Chuck says it was “inconceivable that the Messiah would be suffered and killed on a cross.”
  • Muslim denial is explicit: Surah 4 says, “they killed him not nor crucified, but so it was made to appear to them.”
  • Chuck frames the need: “the Christ had to suffer and die on the cross. He had to.”
Discussion Follow-ups Do you feel more pressure to defend the historical fact of the crucifixion, or the meaning of it—and why?

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next