Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 10
Chuck lists multiple foreshadowings of the cross (Moses’ outstretched hands, Isaac carrying the wood, “government on his shoulders,” Noah saved by wood, and the “wood and water” pattern that “breaks the laws”); which of these typologies strengthens your faith most and which feels like a stretch, and what standard should Christians use to discern faithful “Old Testament proof” from creative overreach?
Another way to ask: Which Old Testament “pictures” of the cross builds your faith most, and which one feels like a stretch? What rule should Christians use to tell good Old Testament proof from creative over-reading?

Direct Answer Based on the transcript, the strongest typologies are the ones directly tied to New Testament teaching (like Jesus linking the bronze serpent to being “lifted up,” and Paul/Peter linking Passover to Christ). The more speculative ones (like broad “wood and water” patterns) may still be faith-building, but the transcript implies we should treat them as interesting early-Christian observations rather than the main proof.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chuck distinguishes “four examples… primarily” (serpent, lamb, Isaiah 53, Psalm 22) from “other foreshadowings… seen by the early Christians.”
  • Some typology is explicitly grounded in Jesus’ words: John 3:14—“Just as Moses lifted up the snake… so the Son of Man must be lifted up.”
  • Some is grounded in apostolic statements: “Christ, our Passover lamb has been sacrificed” (Paul) and “a lamb without blemish” (Peter).
  • The extra examples are introduced as “very interesting… early Christians saw,” like Moses’ posture, Isaac carrying wood, Isaiah 9 “government… shoulders,” and Noah “saved by wood.”
  • Chuck admits the “wood and water” set is exploratory: “Maybe you can help me figure out what that is.”
Discussion Follow-ups What should carry more weight in evangelism: typology Jesus/apostles explicitly endorse, or patterns later Christians noticed? How can we keep wonder without overstating certainty?