Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 1
Chuck Pike frames the class with Carl Sagan’s line, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” then asks whether you personally could provide extraordinary evidence that Jesus is the Son of God; what “extraordinary evidence” do you actually lean on in real conversations, and what does that reveal about what you think God expects from Christian witness?
Another way to ask: Could you give “extraordinary evidence” that Jesus is the Son of God? In real talks, what evidence do you actually use, and what does that show about what you think God wants from Christian witness?

Direct Answer Based on Chuck Pike’s framing, the “extraordinary evidence” Christians should lean on is (1) eyewitness testimony of Jesus’ death and resurrection and (2) fulfilled Old Testament prophecy, especially prophecy fulfilled in the cross. That suggests God expects Christian witness to be more than sincere feelings—He expects us to be equipped to give reasons grounded in Scripture and history.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chuck highlights Carl Sagan: “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” then agrees: “I would say amen to that.”
  • He names “two sources of extraordinary evidence… The first one is the eyewitness accounts… The other thing is the fulfillment of prophecy.”
  • He asks directly: “Could you personally provide extraordinary evidence to an unbeliever that Jesus was the Son of God?”
  • He notes prophecy was made “five… eight hundred… 1,500 years before the birth of Jesus,” making it part of the evidence.
  • He says Acts evangelism relied “heavily” on prophecy “to convince the unbelieving Jews.”
Discussion Follow-ups Which of the two kinds of evidence do you actually use most, and what training would help you use the other more confidently?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next