Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 9
In Psalm 2, the commands “Serve the Lord with fear…Kiss the Son lest he be angry and you perish” present the Messiah’s reign as confrontational and dangerous to resist; how does that tone compare with modern Christianity’s comfort-first messaging, and what would repentance and “submission to the King” look like in specific areas of your life?
Another way to ask: Psalm 2 warns people not to resist the Messiah; how does that compare with today’s comfort-focused Christianity, and what would real repentance and submitting to Jesus as King look like in your life?

Direct Answer Chuck presents Psalm 2 as showing the Messiah’s reign as authoritative and unavoidable: rulers conspire, but God installs His King and warns of perishing if they resist. Compared to comfort-first messaging, this frames the gospel as allegiance to a ruling King, where repentance means real submission, not just spiritual inspiration.

Support from Transcript:

  • Psalm 2 depicts opposition: “The kings of the earth set themselves…against the Lord and against His anointed/His Christ.”
  • God’s response is not negotiation: “Yet I have set my king on my holy hill of Zion.”
  • The King is called God’s Son: “You are my son. Today I have begotten you…Ask of me and I’ll give you the nations.”
  • The warning is sharp: “Serve the Lord with fear…Kiss the Son lest he be angry and you perish…Blessed are all those who put their trust in him.”
  • Chuck summarizes: “the Christ, the Son of God, the King, all referring to the same person…[who] would rule…over all nations…in the end.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would it look like to treat Jesus as King in daily decisions (money, relationships, sexuality, time)? The transcript doesn’t list applications, so name one concrete area where you need to “submit to the King.”