Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in
All Questions
Question 7
Lactantius gives four reasons the 2 Samuel 7 promise cannot ultimately be Solomon (timing after David’s death, “forever” kingdom, “forever” temple, and being called “Son of God”); which of these arguments is strongest to you, which feels weakest, and how would you respond to someone who says Christians are “reading Jesus back into” the Old Testament?
Another way to ask: Which of Lactantius’s four reasons best shows the 2 Samuel 7 promise can’t ultimately be about Solomon, which reason seems weakest, and how would you answer someone who says Christians are forcing Jesus into the Old Testament?

Direct Answer Based on Chuck’s presentation, the “forever” language and the “Son of God” title seem strongest because they exceed Solomon’s historical limits, while the timing argument depends on noticing that Solomon ruled while David was still alive. To the “reading Jesus back” objection, Chuck’s response is essentially: these claims are written centuries before Jesus and are used by the apostles as direct evidence.

Support from Transcript:

  • Chuck cites Lactantius’ first point: the promised seed would be raised up “when your days are fulfilled…sleep with your fathers,” yet Solomon came to the throne “while [David] was still alive.”
  • Second point: the prophecy says the kingdom/throne “forever,” but Solomon’s reign was “40 years,” and his dynasty ended in judgment.
  • Third point: Chronicles says God would establish him “in my house…forever,” yet “Solomon’s [temple] was destroyed by men.”
  • Fourth point: “Solomon was never called the Son of God…God said, ‘I will be his father and he will be my son.’”
  • Chuck connects this to apostolic argumentation: Acts 2 ties Psalm 2, Psalm 16, Psalm 110 to Jesus’ resurrection and lordship.
Discussion Follow-ups Which piece of evidence would a skeptical “truth seeker” find most checkable: the timeline, the titles (“Son of God”), or the “forever” scope compared to Israel’s history?

Jumpstarter 7 of 10
Back Questions Next