Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 2 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Myth of Christian America  /  MCA (14 of 14): How God Was Written Out of the US Constitution  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 2
Bercot argues that “every nation on earth should acknowledge that there is a God” and that governmental authority is “granted…by God” (citing Jesus’ words to Pilate); how does that claim reshape the way Christians should talk about political authority, legitimacy, and national “rights” today?
Another way to ask: If all nations should admit God exists and that government authority comes from God, how should Christians talk today about who has political power, what makes a government “legit,” and what a nation has a “right” to do?

Direct Answer The transcript suggests Christians should speak of political authority as something God permits and grants, not something a nation possesses autonomously, which should humble national claims and keep government from being treated as ultimate.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says, “Every nation on earth should acknowledge that there is a God,” and should recognize its “power… to have authority here on earth, comes from God.”
  • He cites Jesus to Pilate: Pilate would have “no authority… if it had not been granted… by God.”
  • He distinguishes acknowledgment from approval: the Declaration mentions God, “Not that what they were doing was necessarily… according to the teachings of God, but at least they acknowledged” God.
  • Later he concludes “there’s no such thing as a Christian government,” and that the “two kingdoms need to be kept separate,” so legitimacy is not the same as being God’s kingdom.
  • He praises even pagan rulers in the Old Testament (Cyrus, Darius, Artaxerxes) for acknowledging or protecting God’s people, implying governments can be non-Christian yet still recognize God.
Discussion Follow-ups How would Christian language about “rights” change if we regularly spoke of them as accountable to God rather than grounded mainly in national identity?

Jumpstarter 2 of 10
Back Questions Next