Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s teaching, the sharpest contrast is that many state constitutions openly name God and even require Christian or Protestant belief for office, while the U.S. Constitution not only avoids mentioning God but explicitly forbids religious tests—making the omission look planned.

Support from Transcript:

• Delaware required officeholders to swear, “I do profess faith in God the Father and in Jesus Christ… and… the holy scriptures… given by divine inspiration.”
• North Carolina barred office for anyone who denies “the being of God” or “the truth of the Protestant religion” or the “divine authority… of the Old or New Testaments.”
• Pennsylvania required legislators to affirm belief in “one God” and that the Old and New Testaments are “given by divine inspiration.”
• Massachusetts not only acknowledged “the great legislature of the universe” but said public order depends on “piety, religion, and morality,” and supported “public Protestant teachers.”
• In contrast, U.S. Constitution Article 6 says, “No religious test shall ever be required,” which Bercot notes allows “an atheist… a Muslim… anybody” to hold office.
• Bercot emphasizes “no reference to God whatsoever” in the U.S. Constitution, unlike the Declaration and Articles of Confederation that mention “nature’s God” or “the great governor of the world.”