Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 8 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
The Myth of Christian America  /  MCA (13 of 14): Faith of the Founding Fathers #3  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 8
Bercot says Madison opposed government support of Christianity not primarily from “two kingdoms” conviction but from “little regard” for Christianity, citing his resistance to mentioning Jesus in Virginia’s religious liberty bill and his objections to congressional chaplains; what evidence in the quotes makes Madison look principled versus hostile, and how do we discern motives when someone uses “religious freedom” language?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Madison opposed government support of Christianity more from lack of faith than from principle. What in Madison’s words makes him seem principled versus hostile, and how can we tell someone’s motives when they use “religious freedom” language?

Direct Answer The quotes show Madison could sound principled—arguing religion should not be directed by “force or violence” and opposing tax-funded worship—yet Bercot argues his repeated resistance to even naming Jesus and his desire to remove religion from public life makes him look hostile rather than merely consistent.

Support from Transcript:

  • Principled-sounding language: “religion…can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence,” and must be left to “conviction and conscience.”
  • Madison argued people should not be taxed to support religion at all; Bercot interprets him as protecting those who “didn’t want any of their money to go to support any religion.”
  • When conservative Christians wanted a reference to Jesus in the Virginia bill, Madison opposed it: better reverence is “not to profane it by making it a topic of legislative discussion.”
  • Madison objected to congressional chaplains, arguing they amount to an establishment because worship is performed by ministers “paid out of the national taxes.”
  • Bercot’s conclusion after studying Madison: these were “not his real reasons…he had little regard for it himself,” calling Madison’s reasons “mere rhetoric.”
  • Bercot says Madison wanted religion “totally out of everything” and was key in writing God out of the Constitution.
Discussion Follow-ups What kinds of patterns help us evaluate motives beyond stated reasons? How should Christians respond when “religious freedom” language is used to remove all public acknowledgement of God?

Jumpstarter 8 of 10
Back Questions Next