Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 1
David Bercot argues that Jesus’ “speck and beam” teaching in Matthew 7:3–5 is primarily a command to stop focusing on a brother’s sins and instead focus on your own—how does that reading confront the way you’ve heard this passage used to justify “correcting” others, and what would it change in your daily conversations about other Christians?
Another way to ask: Bercot says Jesus’ “speck and beam” teaching is mainly about stopping our focus on other Christians’ sins and looking at our own. How does that challenge the way you’ve heard this passage used to defend “correcting” people, and how would it change your everyday talks about other Christians?

Direct Answer Based on David Bercot’s teaching, the passage confronts the common use of Matthew 7:3–5 as a “how-to” for correcting others; he says Jesus’ main point is to stop fixating on a brother’s faults and deal with your own sins first. In daily conversations, it would shift us away from fault-finding talk and toward self-examination and humility.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says he often hears Christians claim “Jesus wants us to get the speck out of our brother’s eye,” and then they explain how to do it—but he asks, “is that what Jesus said?”
  • He states the early Christians heard it differently: “Why are you worrying about your brother’s sins when you should be looking at your own sins?”
  • He identifies the “speck” as “what’s wrong with your brother” and the “beam” as “your own sins.”
  • He insists Jesus is “not encouraging you to worry about the speck… He’s telling you not to look at that, to look at the beam in your own eye.”
  • He calls the “speck-removal” posture acting: “You hypocrite… You’re just acting… being self-righteous… judgmental.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would change if most of our comments about other Christians had to pass the test: “Am I talking because I care, or because I’m judging?”