Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 5 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Matthew: The Chief Gospel  /  Tax Collector: From Despised to Disciple (Matthew Chapter 9)  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 5
Bercot rejects the common “tax collectors were hated mainly because they worked for Rome” explanation and replaces it with a picture of legalized extortion, violence, and desecration; how does that historical argument change the moral weight of Jesus eating with tax collectors, and what does it suggest about repentance, restitution, and social repair for people with predatory jobs?
Another way to ask: If tax collectors were known for legalized extortion and violence, how does that make Jesus eating with them even more shocking? What might real repentance look like for people whose jobs harm others, including paying back and fixing damage?

Direct Answer Based on Bercot’s historical explanation, Jesus eating with tax collectors is not merely crossing a political boundary; it is engaging people known for robbery and brutality. That makes the fellowship more morally weighty, implying Jesus’ call reaches perpetrators of serious injustice—yet the transcript does not spell out what repentance or restitution should look like in detail.

Support from Transcript:

  • Bercot says the “traitor because they worked for Rome” idea is not in the Bible and not in early Christian or first-century Jewish writers.
  • He describes the tax system as “farmed out” and driven by massive bids (Josephus example: 8,000 talents; then someone offers “twice that”).
  • Because of the money involved, collectors became “basically thugs,” squeezing people to make profit.
  • Philo calls them “the most pitiless of men…full of every kind of inhumanity,” describing torture and even seizing a corpse during a funeral to force payment.
  • This background explains why it was a “scandal” that Jesus reached out to them and chose one as an apostle.
Discussion Follow-ups If someone’s job has harmed others, what would “following Jesus” require beyond quitting—making amends, repairing trust, and changing how they handle power? The transcript hints at the severity of harm but leaves application details for discussion.

Jumpstarter 5 of 10
Back Questions Next