Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in
Question 5
He uses 1 Corinthians 11 and the head covering to argue that commentators invented a Corinth-prostitute narrative to avoid a practice modern people disliked; where do you think modern Christianity most strongly pressures interpretation in that same way today, and how can a group honestly detect when it is “trying to make Scripture say what we want”?
Another way to ask: Where do you think Christians today feel the strongest pressure to explain away Bible teachings they dislike? How can a group tell when it’s trying to make Scripture say what it wants?

Direct Answer The transcript’s key warning is that modern preferences can drive people to invent explanations that remove the force of Scripture, especially when a practice becomes unpopular. Bercot doesn’t list today’s pressure points, but he gives a method: test claims against primary sources and beware of convenient stories that appear when obedience becomes costly.

Support from Transcript:

  • He says in the 19th century, as women stopped covering, “commentators started making things up about Corinth.”
  • The invented claim: prostitutes in Corinth supposedly went uncovered, so uncovered women were “assumed… prostitute[s].”
  • He insists: “Where did they get that?… There is no ancient writing that says anything about that. Totally made up.”
  • He argues Paul wasn’t making a Corinth-only rule; Corinth was “departing from the traditions… not following what the rest of the church is doing.”
  • He notes evidence against the myth: Roman images/writers show many pagan women uncovered; the prostitute claim is “totally made up… to fit what somebody in the 20th or 21st century wants to hear.”
Discussion Follow-ups As a group, ask: “Is this explanation documented, or is it just useful?” Also ask: “Did this story arise right when Christians wanted to stop obeying that passage?”