Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.
The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 1 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Intimacy with God  /  Chapter 20: Cleansing the Soul  /  Discussion Questions
All Questions
Question 1
The chapter claims, “God’s grace finds no entrance into the impure soul.” What does David Bercot (and the cited teaching) seem to mean by “impure,” and how does this challenge common evangelical instincts about grace arriving first and cleansing later?
Another way to ask: What do Bercot and the quoted teaching mean by an “impure” soul? How does that push back on the common idea that grace comes first and then cleanses you later?

Direct Answer “Impure” in the transcript mainly means a soul entangled with “wrong desires,” especially material desires and affection for the world—so full of possessions in the heart that there is no room for God. This challenges an instinct that grace automatically enters first regardless of the soul’s orientation, because the teaching presents purity (detachment and obedience) as the condition that allows grace to “find entrance.”

Support from Transcript:

  • “God’s grace finds no entrance into the impure soul.”
  • “The soul that is rich in material desires, entangled with affection for the things of this world, is impure.”
  • The “deadly combination” is “wealth with wrong desires,” and losing wealth could be “a healthy alternative.”
  • Purifying the “poor and bare” soul is tied to Jesus’ words: “Come, follow me” (Mark 10:21), implying a call to obedient following.
  • Life/death is located in “the soul’s purity and obedience to God” versus “breaking of the commandments.”
Discussion Follow-ups How would you describe the difference between receiving grace while clinging to wrong desires versus receiving grace as you actually “follow” Christ? What parts of your life most compete for “entrance” into your soul?

Jumpstarter 1 of 10
Back Questions Next