Skip to content

Add your phone number?

Optional. Nothing is sent unless you choose it.

The Historic Faith
Sign in

Jumpstarter 10 of 10

Ideas to help restart your discussion
Question 10
Peter says, “We have left all,” and Jesus promises “a hundred times as much now… with persecutions,” and “in the world to come… life everlasting,” ending with “many who are first will be last.” What concrete decisions about possessions, family ties, security, and social status would “leaving what is his own… for my sake and the sake of the Gospel” require in a modern context, and what would it look like to embrace the promised “with persecutions” rather than treating suffering as a sign something is wrong?
Another way to ask: What might it actually cost today to “leave everything” for Jesus—money, comfort, family plans, safety, or social status? What would it look like to accept suffering and pushback as part of following Jesus, instead of assuming it means something has gone wrong?

Direct Answer The transcript’s concrete content is that leaving “parents, brothers, and possessions” for Jesus and the Gospel involves real relinquishment of what is “his own,” trusting Christ’s promise of new provision “now… with persecutions” and eternal life later. Embracing “with persecutions” means expecting hardship as part of the promised reward package, not interpreting it as spiritual failure.

Support from Transcript:

  • Peter’s claim sets the theme: “See, we have left all and followed you.”
  • Jesus defines the sacrifice broadly: “Whoever leaves what is his own—parents, brothers, and possessions—for my sake and the sake of the Gospel…”
  • He promises compensation in this life: “will receive a hundred times as much now in this world of lands and possessions and houses and brothers…”
  • He adds the key qualifier: “with persecutions,” showing suffering is included, not excluded.
  • He promises final reward: “in the world to come he will receive life everlasting.”
  • He reverses status expectations: “many who are first will be last, and the last will be first.”
Discussion Follow-ups What would it mean today to hold family ties and possessions as something you could truly “leave” if Christ required it? How might the phrase “with persecutions” reshape prosperity-minded expectations about faithfulness?